Chip Flemmer
EdTech 504
· Where are you now, in terms of your own teaching practice and the inclusion of educational technology in that process?
I would have to say that I am
still developing to be great at creating a student-centered learning
environment and incorporating educational technology in the process. Like most
of my classmates, I was a product of a mostly teacher-centered learning
environment. Most of my recollection of educational technology in my elementary
days would consist of playing Oregon Trail on an old Apple II computer in the
back of the room.
I would like to think that I am doing better at including educational
technology than the majority of teachers in my school. I use your typical Power
Point presentations and a wide variety of multimedia sources in my classroom to
help enhance our learning, but I really wish that I had more access to student
computers in my social studies class. I have zero student computers because my
school has an integrations lab (30 computers) as well as a computer literacy
class which is geared to teach the students the basics in computer technology.
I can and have taken my students to the integration lab; but it can easily
become a pain to reserve the lab and try to make sure all the other social
studies teachers are willing to collaborate on a lesson in the lab (we all work
together on the same lessons and getting all to agree can sometimes be
challenging).
The school where I work has an upper-middle class population and if we have a
student without access to the internet it is quite rare. With having this
benefit, it is easy to ask students to research things on the internet or type
up an assignment at home. So what I am trying to say is that if I am not able
to utilize technology as much as I may like in my classroom, at least I can
continue to have my students access a variety of technologies which have been
incorporated into our assignments.
· What kind of change do you hope to see as a result of this class?
As far as changes in my teaching coming from this class are concerned; I am not sure specifically what I hope see at the end of the semester. Instead of giving specifics, I will list some general items that I hope to see. I want to be able to critique my own teaching styles to make sure that they do line up with a student-centered learning style. I also want to understand a little more about good practices when a teacher-centered style of instruction is used. I also want to figure out more ways that I can incorporate technology into my classroom when I have limited access to student computers. I feel that I do a good job within my circumstances, but I want to learn more to make sure that there isn't something that I could add to my repertoire (I know there will be things to add).
· How might your knowledge and experiences influence the actions of those around you?
I think that having twelve years of teaching experience in a
school district where many of our teachers have five years or less of
experience can really help influence those newer teachers to listen to what I
see and be more willing to take my advice. I worked with a first-year teacher
last year and felt that I had a very positive influence on how he improved
throughout the year as a teacher. This year he is now teaching in another grade
and things are going very well. I will not take the credit, by any stretch of
the imagination, but I think that I was able to guide and help him with the
knowledge and experience I have through just having been on the job a long time
and trying to always get better at what I do.
Looking back to 1997, my first year teaching, makes me feel fortunate to have
been in a school district that was on the cutting-edge of technology. I worked
for the Union Gap (WA) School District (which is a little K-8 district south of
Yakima). Our superintendent was way ahead of the game in regards to technology
use in the classroom. This guy was amazing and he wanted to save the district
money so he basically did all the leg work to set up our computer lab and
intranet. His biggest problem was that he had an older teaching staff which for
the most part was apprehensive about utilizing technology in the classroom. I
was asked if I wanted to be a part of this group called SHARE 105 which would
receive training and work to collect lessons that could be published on the
internet. We also received our own web page which I began using to publish my
homework assignments as well as pictures of class projects. When I look back to
that experience in 1997 it was a great opportunity for a first-year teacher to
dive into educational technology head-first. I was rewarded with two or three
Power Macs to use in my classroom which was great. It is funny doing the time
line activity because I can't believe how quickly technology has expanded since
1997 and I feel fortunate to have had a chance to see these changes take place.
In researching the various epistemological beliefs I have
discovered points that I like and agree with from both the behaviorist as well
as the constructivist stance. I completely agree that many of us make our
decisions based on the consequences that are reinforced from what we expect the
result of our decision to be. I have many students (and I was generally this
way as well) who want to know what hoop(s) they need to jump through to
"get an A." These students know that they will be happy and their
parents will be happy with the letter grade. I made no mention of whether or
not they learned anything in that class or will even retain a tiny-bit of
information that will stay with them once they make their final exit out of the
door. With my experience of seeing that behavior so frequently; I see the
validity that our behaviors are highly influenced by the reinforcement that
generally follows (whether positive or negative).
On the other side, I really like the constructivist school of thought, because
I also have personal experience applying learning from one class or avenue of
life into another. The idea of our learning being like scaffolding appeals to
me, it gives me hope that I can make myself better and any actions and
decisions I make are not going to be based strictly on the reinforcement
anticipated.
With agreeing with points from both sides, I can see the inconsistencies;
however, I accept the fact that I am an anomaly. In my classroom there are
consequences to various behaviors (both positive and negative), but I would
like to think that my students are building their knowledge-base each day and
growing into future leaders and great thinkers.
I try to incorporate technology into my curriculum for the same reason that I
try to use visuals, hands-on, lecture, reading assignments, and active learning
games; I want to address all the various styles of learning in my classroom. I
do have a strong belief that we all learn differently and there isn't a one
size fits all for my classroom.
In using the computer, some of my students would thrive with a skill and drill
game, others can read and take tests with ease (while other students need paper
and pencil tests--something tangible besides a keyboard), and simulations get
some of my higher-level students to apply critical thinking into the activity.
Even though I believe that some of the behaviorist theories are valid, I
wouldn't go as far as saying that I would fall under the objectivist epistemology.
More reflection after this past week at school (2/21/09)...I realize that when
I am in a time crunch that I am a big-time behaviorist and slamming
direct-instruction down my student's throats like a mama putting down a vitamin
in an unwilling son. When I have time to operate and create a lesson, I become
Mr. Constructivist, designing stations with great interactive games that help
motivate and educate the students. I don't want to seem hypocritical, but I
would like to view myself as a constructivist with student-centered learning
taking place; however, when time constraints and deadlines loom, I tend to slip
into direct-instruction mode just to get the job done.