Lesson Plan Activity:
African Regions
I decided to take one of
my lessons just dripping with direct-instruction qualities and try to morph it
into a more student-centered lesson. My
social studies classes are currently involved in an African unit of study and
one of our lessons covers four major regions on the continent of Africa. This lesson could be easily described as a
great remedy for any sleepless night.
The lesson is highly-boring and lacking any motivation for the students
whatsoever. This is a great opportunity
for me to take a lesson with very low motivation and try to mold it into
something that is still educational, but also exciting. The African Regions lesson is about to have a
facelift; something that is long overdue.
Objectives:
Duration:
Materials Needed:
Procedures:
Assessment:
Summary of the Original Lesson:
I don’t mind the journal portion of this lesson; but that is about the only thing that is worth keeping. I plan to remodel this lesson so that when it is finished we will see a product that is much more student-centered. In the appendix you will see the slides from the PowerPoint presentation over the African Regions. These slides are what the students will be copying down into their interactive student notebooks (A.K.A. spirals).
The African Regions lesson in its original state is highly boring and has very little motivation for the student to become excited about this topic. The major instructional theory behind the lesson is direct-instruction. This lesson just lent itself to being presented with the help of PowerPoint and having the students passively taking notes. After the notes were copies, the instructor would discuss the findings with the class and it was expected that the students would have an understanding on the topic which would help them on their Africa test.
Reasons for Changing
The primary reason for wanting to make a change with this lesson is the fact that I want to remove the direct-instruction element from ruling the entire learning process with this activity. There are many teachers that do not present an exciting approach to history, probably because they were taught in the dates-facts method (Bransford & Brown, 2000). I don’t want to be accused of making social studies boring. My students need to understand the concept and characteristics of the four main regions in Africa; but I want them to learn it in a more student-centered learning environment. The best analogy that I can think of with making this change is turning your thermostat at home from heating to cooling. It doesn’t take too long to push the button to make the switch; however, the results are quite different on what is happening as well as being produced.
The re-designed lesson for teaching the four primary regions of Africa will shift to being a student-learning environment through a constructivist approach in which the students will work at stations and then teach each other the information over the regions. I chose this theory because I wanted to make the lesson a much more learner-friendly lesson. As much as I want to shift to a student-centered approach, I understand that it is not always just one or the other (student-centered or teacher-centered). It was said (O’Neill & McMahon, 2005) that learning is often presented in this dualism of either student–centered learning or teacher–centered learning. In the reality of practice the situation is less black and white.
Below are the same objects as were previously stated in the original lesson. The reason that the objectives were not changed is because they are a part of our standards that we have to address in our social studies class. I am not concerned with changing the objectives, but rather the way that we meet the objectives.
Objectives:
Duration:
Materials Needed:
Procedures:
Assessment:
Summary of the New Lesson:
The whole point of modifying this lesson was to take away the teacher-directed instruction and put the learning in the hands of the students. I wanted to swing the pendulum from the students being passive learners to being active learners. It was said (Jones, 2000, p. 25) that in a student-centered classroom, our role as a teacher is to help and encourage the students to develop their skills without relinquishing our more traditional role as a source of information, advice, and knowledge. Teachers are supposed to be there to help guide the students and facilitate their learning.
I believe that through some minor tweaking that this goal was accomplished and the lesson will better received by the students compared to just sitting down and writing notes from a PowerPoint.
References:
Bransford, J., & Brown, A. L. (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Jones, L. (2007). The Student-Centered Classroom. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
O’Neill, G., & McMahon, T. (2005). Student-Centered Learning: What Does It Mean for Students and Lecturers? Retrieved March 2, 2009, from http://www.aishe.org/readings/2005-1/oneill-mcmahon-Tues_19th_Oct_SCL.pdf
Appendix



